Reflection on Social Media Case 5: Paypal Deleted Comments


The year, 2011 was winding down and kids were counting down the days until Christmas. Their parents and other generous adults were looking for ways to help make the holidays a little better for the underserved in society. A gaggle of humans who followed Regretsy, a satirical blog by April Winchell, decided to donate to a fundraising campaign she set up to help people who were struggling to make ends meet.
But then PayPal did something they would regret. And then did something else they would also regret, followed by one more regretful decision.
I am sure you are asking why a company would make so many regretful decisions right after another. I am too. But I didn’t come here to give you answers, but merely facts.
And these are the 3 facts, which will now be known as the 3 Bad Decisions of PayPal in December 2011:
  1. Early December, 2011: PayPal decided to shut down the charity drive on Regretsy. (And told Regretsy to return all the money to the donors. I know, that part alone could have had its own number, but I am trying to keep things simple.)
    1. Why? Because $4,000 in donations came in quickly, which raised flags on PayPal’s end and made them worry about fraud.
  2. December 5, 2011: (This one isn’t a bad decision per se, but a poorly planned maneuver.) PayPal posts a completely unrelated post about an article in Forbes featuring PayPal.
    1. The internet decides it is a chance to rant about how underhanded and Scrooge-y PayPal is.
  3. And what does PayPal do? Oh, you know, they start DELETING the negative comments. Yes, DELETING them.

But, I am going to take your mind for a spin when I tell you that DELETING comments is not going to make angry people feel better! In fact, it is going to make those angry people even ANGRIER!

In the end, all kind of ended well, since PayPal publicly apologized and even went so far as to offer to donate to the charity drive as well (though I could never find verification that they actually did.
I have decided to take away a few lessons from this case study:

·         The internet knows everything. Don’t try to hide stuff and delete stuff because the internet will bring all your past transgressions and anything you are trying to hide will look like a dirty little secret. Be transparent.
·         Negative Reviews give companies a chance to make a good impression. I am serious. A bad review doesn’t immediately mean a bad company or product. If I see that a company has taken time to respond to the negative comments without being defensive, the credibility of that company goes way up. Business Insider has some advice on this as well.
·         Don’t take toys away from poor children. It just isn’t nice.

There you have it. Be honest. Acknowledge when you made a mistake and try to make it right. And be nice. The rules that would have saved PayPal are the same things I am trying to incorporate in my personal life.

Comments

  1. UnknownFebruary 22, 2018 at 12:14 PM

    Hi Emily,
    Thanks for your insights. I also think that negative comments can help people do better. Deleting them doesn't leave any room for growth!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflection on Social Media Case 1: McDStories

Image
Sometimes things don’t go as planned. Sometimes even a big company like McDonald’s can make an innocent mistake that has some costly consequences. In 2011, McDonald’s had the idea to create two hashtags to promote their company. The first one, #MeetTheFarmers, was to show consumers that the food was fresh and to make the farmers a big part of the company. The second hashtag, #McDStories, had the intention to get people to share good stories and memories of McDonald’s, but instead it had the opposite effect. People shared horrible experiences, such as the ones listed on Business Insider “-- Dude, I used to work at McDonald's. The #McDStories I could tell would raise your hair.” I think McDonald’s didn’t think through this idea. Obviously, people love McDonald’s. It is a multi-national, multibillion dollar business. But surely, they had to think that there are people who have had bad experiences there. It is fast-food. In a case study of this event published here , it p
Read more

Reflection on Social Media Case 9: Ponderize

Image
Ethics can be a tricky thing when it comes to Social Media. Let’s take the example of the Durrant family and the Ponderize scandal. It went down like this: Elder Devin Durrant, a general authority in the Mormon Church gave a talk and coined a new phrase, “Ponderize” which is the combination of the words “ponder” and “memorize.” Members of the church were moved by the talk in general conference, and conveniently, there was a website selling shirts with “Ponderize” for sale immediately during the break. Who was selling the t-shirts? Well, it was Elder Durrant’s son, Ryan. Apparently, he set up the webpage about a week before General Conference. It didn’t take long for people to start complaining that Ryan and Elder Durrant were trying to use Elder Durrant’s position in the church for their own financial gain. According to Wikipedia, I think this could kind of be considered spiritual opportunism , or using religion as a path toward personal gain. Since Elder Durrant got to c
Read more

New Technology Assignment

Image
New technology is coming that has the ability to protect the privacy of social media users: Blockchain. Blockchain is basically an encrypted online wallet that users can set up to verify to companies that they are who they say they are, all while keeping that information secure and out of the hands of anyone who shouldn’t have access to it. Currently, Blockchain is being tested for financial transactions, but I see it being useful for any kind of transactions. While this technology is not quite perfected yet, a lot of companies are investing in the technology because we are in somewhat of a privacy crisis. Within the last few months there have been huge security breaches concerning online data, with the biggest example being Facebook’s recent case where they sold data to Cambridge Analitica, who then used that data to target unsuspecting users with fake news and other malicious information. This kind of data breach can have huge impacts on politics, safety, and th
Read more