Reflection on Social Media Case 3: Tom Petty’s “Death” and Death


Fans of Tom Petty received some devastating news on October 2, 2017 at 1:00 PM: He had died from cardiac arrest as reported by the Los Angeles Police Department and confirmed to CBS News. The tributes swept the internet. Fans were sad to lose a legend.
But wait, at 1:41 PM on October 2, 2017, just 41 minutes after CBS’s report, TMZ posted the following via Twitter: “UPDATE At this time, Tom’s still clinging to life. A report that LAPD confirmed the singer’s death is inaccurate.” It wasn’t long before the internet was abuzz with confusion. Was Tom Petty dead or not?
Tom Petty’s daughter, AnnaKim called out the Rolling Stones magazine, stating, “My dad is not dead yet but your f***ing magazine is.”
She had a right to be angry; she was trying to cope with the reality of a parent who was dying. She and her mother confirmed Tom Petty died later that day at 8:40 PM. Instead of being able to mourn their loss, they were bombarded by questions of whether their loved one was dead and when he died.
So what went wrong? How can a news channel such as CBS post something inaccurate? How could CBS, who, before this case study, was more credible than TMZ in my book, get something this important so wrong?
The answer comes from the pressure of news sources to be the first to report. Nobody wants to be reposting someone else’s news, so everyone is in a rush to get the breaking news out there to the public before anybody else. In this case, CBS somehow got inaccurate information (or possibly misconstrued the information given to them) from the LAPD and quickly posted it before they made sure the information was accurate.
And what are the consequences of getting the news out first, but then having to retract when it is found to be inaccurate? There is a loss of credibility.
The thing that gets me, is that I would have read the original CBS news release and felt like it was credible. It supposedly had confirmation from the Los Angeles Police Department that Tom Petty, in fact, had passed away.
So how do we make sure not to fall victim of fake news? I guess we double-check our sources. And sometimes, we rely on people closest to the situation, such as Tom Petty’s daughter, AnnaKim.
So, R.I.P. Tom Petty. You were pretty dang awesome. I am sorry that your last day on this earth is linked with confusion and missteps. Rock on.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflection on Social Media Case 1: McDStories

Image
Sometimes things don’t go as planned. Sometimes even a big company like McDonald’s can make an innocent mistake that has some costly consequences. In 2011, McDonald’s had the idea to create two hashtags to promote their company. The first one, #MeetTheFarmers, was to show consumers that the food was fresh and to make the farmers a big part of the company. The second hashtag, #McDStories, had the intention to get people to share good stories and memories of McDonald’s, but instead it had the opposite effect. People shared horrible experiences, such as the ones listed on Business Insider “-- Dude, I used to work at McDonald's. The #McDStories I could tell would raise your hair.” I think McDonald’s didn’t think through this idea. Obviously, people love McDonald’s. It is a multi-national, multibillion dollar business. But surely, they had to think that there are people who have had bad experiences there. It is fast-food. In a case study of this event published here , it p
Read more

Reflection on Social Media Case 9: Ponderize

Image
Ethics can be a tricky thing when it comes to Social Media. Let’s take the example of the Durrant family and the Ponderize scandal. It went down like this: Elder Devin Durrant, a general authority in the Mormon Church gave a talk and coined a new phrase, “Ponderize” which is the combination of the words “ponder” and “memorize.” Members of the church were moved by the talk in general conference, and conveniently, there was a website selling shirts with “Ponderize” for sale immediately during the break. Who was selling the t-shirts? Well, it was Elder Durrant’s son, Ryan. Apparently, he set up the webpage about a week before General Conference. It didn’t take long for people to start complaining that Ryan and Elder Durrant were trying to use Elder Durrant’s position in the church for their own financial gain. According to Wikipedia, I think this could kind of be considered spiritual opportunism , or using religion as a path toward personal gain. Since Elder Durrant got to c
Read more

New Technology Assignment

Image
New technology is coming that has the ability to protect the privacy of social media users: Blockchain. Blockchain is basically an encrypted online wallet that users can set up to verify to companies that they are who they say they are, all while keeping that information secure and out of the hands of anyone who shouldn’t have access to it. Currently, Blockchain is being tested for financial transactions, but I see it being useful for any kind of transactions. While this technology is not quite perfected yet, a lot of companies are investing in the technology because we are in somewhat of a privacy crisis. Within the last few months there have been huge security breaches concerning online data, with the biggest example being Facebook’s recent case where they sold data to Cambridge Analitica, who then used that data to target unsuspecting users with fake news and other malicious information. This kind of data breach can have huge impacts on politics, safety, and th
Read more